Fourth Circuit Chief Judge Retires

Posted by marykeating on July 14, 2009 under Court news | Be the First to Comment

Chief Judge Karen Williamson of the Fourth Circuit announced last week that she will retire early on disability due to early-onset Alzheimer’s disease.  Appointed by George H. W. Bush, Judge Williamson has been on the Court of Appeals for 17 years.

There are now five openings on the Fourth Circuit.  Judge Andre M. Davis of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland has been nominated, and has gotten through the Senate Committee; no vote has been held by the full Senate, which of course is focusing on Judge Sotomayor’s nomination.  But the Fourth Circuit has had several vacancies for some years, all through the George W. Bush years.  If President Obama manages to fill all of the open seats, the much-vaunted conservative bastion of the federal system may drift to the center.  The extent to which this will help employment discrimination plaintiffs will depend in part on the Supreme Court, which does not seem to be heading toward the center anytime soon, barring an unexpected vacancy in the conservative majority.  Still, with the Fourth Circuit up to full strength, perhaps there will be more attention paid to appeals that may now be routinely disposed of per curium.

Tax reform for discrimination plaintiffs?

Posted by marykeating on July 10, 2009 under Pending legislation | Be the First to Comment

Employment lawyers have long been lobbying for relief from the tax penalties imposed on winning or settling plaintiffs.  There are several problems, that a new bill is intended to fix.  First of all, employees who get a back pay award to compensate for several years of discrimination receive it in one tax year, ordinarily, and therefore pay at a higher tax rate than if they had gotten the pay originally, or if they could average the compensatory amount over several years.  Second, any damages awarded for the emotional distress associated with sexual harassment or disability discrimination or any other type of non-wage compensation are taxable.  This is opposite of what happens in an accident case, where most or all of the award is tax-free.

The Civil Rights Tax Relief Act of 2009 (CRTRA) is now pending in both houses of Congress. The House bill, H.R. 3035 , and Senate bill, S. 1360 would allow both income averaging and the minimization of taxation on non-economic damages.  Although most employment legislation finds business and employees on opposite sides, these kinds of bills are usually supported by employers and employees alike, since they make it easier to settle cases.  For example, several years ago Congress passed an amendment to the tax code to eliminate the double taxation of discrimination awards.  Before the 2004 American Jobs Creation Act enactment, the tax law required an employee to report as income the entire award or settlement on his tax return, even though a part of the money had been paid to the lawyer.  (The lawyer, of course, paid taxes on the same money.)  Although there was a deduction for the fees, many people found themselves liable for the alternative minimum tax amount.  This law, too, was supported by business and civil rights organizations as a matter of fairness.

Maryland Employment Law Updates

Posted by marykeating on under Uncategorized | Be the First to Comment

Employment law changes rapidly.  Maryland employers and employees have to keep an eye on federal and state law, and sometimes the law of the county or city they do business in.  I’ll try to hit the critical developments and the just plain interesting aspects of employment law.  Feel free to contact me at my email address, or at 410-532-8900.