<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com</link>
	<description>What to watch for in Maryland employment law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:17:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Hospital Accused of Forcing out Injured Workers by The B.c. Workers&#8217; Compensation Legal Kit &#124; auto accident lawyers</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/08/27/hospital-accused-of-forcing-out-injured-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>The B.c. Workers&#8217; Compensation Legal Kit &#124; auto accident lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=451#comment-931</guid>
		<description>[...] Hospital Accused of Forcing out Injured Workers &#124; Maryland &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hospital Accused of Forcing out Injured Workers | Maryland &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unemployment Benefits Extended Again by Unemployment Benefits Extended Again &#124; Maryland Employment Law &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/07/29/unemployment-benefits-extended-again/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Unemployment Benefits Extended Again &#124; Maryland Employment Law &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=431#comment-692</guid>
		<description>[...] View full post on unemployment benefits &#8211; Google Blog Search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View full post on unemployment benefits &#8211; Google Blog Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update on Novaris Sex Discrimination Class Action by Update to Novartis Gender Bias Suit &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/05/21/update-on-novaris-sex-discrimination-class-action/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Update to Novartis Gender Bias Suit &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=377#comment-626</guid>
		<description>[...] As reported here earlier, a massive gender bias lawsuit resulted in a large award for a class of female sales representatives. A jury in New York awarded compensatory and punitive damages to the class. The parties agreed to a settlement so that Novartis will not appeal the case. The presiding judge must approve the settlement before it resolves the case. Under the settlement, Novartis would pay back pay of about $60 million, another $92.5 million for compensatory damages, and $22.5 million for programs that would cleanse the workplace of discrimination. The 65-page settlement agreement sets forth in some detail the manner in which Novartis is to institute programs to deal with future complaints of sexual harassment or discrimination, and cultivating talents of women in the workforce. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As reported here earlier, a massive gender bias lawsuit resulted in a large award for a class of female sales representatives. A jury in New York awarded compensatory and punitive damages to the class. The parties agreed to a settlement so that Novartis will not appeal the case. The presiding judge must approve the settlement before it resolves the case. Under the settlement, Novartis would pay back pay of about $60 million, another $92.5 million for compensatory damages, and $22.5 million for programs that would cleanse the workplace of discrimination. The 65-page settlement agreement sets forth in some detail the manner in which Novartis is to institute programs to deal with future complaints of sexual harassment or discrimination, and cultivating talents of women in the workforce. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, He Made It by New Nominations for the Federal District Court &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2009/11/10/well-he-made-it/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>New Nominations for the Federal District Court &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=214#comment-512</guid>
		<description>[...] confirmed by the full Senate.  Judge Hollander would take Judge Andre Davis’s place, after his promotion to the Fourth Circuit.  Judge Bredar would fill the seat of Judge Frederick Motz, who has taken senior status.  He will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] confirmed by the full Senate.  Judge Hollander would take Judge Andre Davis’s place, after his promotion to the Fourth Circuit.  Judge Bredar would fill the seat of Judge Frederick Motz, who has taken senior status.  He will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women Win Pharmaceutical Industry Sex Bias Class Action by Update on Novaris Sex Discrimination Class Action &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/05/18/women-win-pharmaceutical-industry-sex-bias-class-action/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Update on Novaris Sex Discrimination Class Action &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=374#comment-410</guid>
		<description>[...] finding Novartis liable for wide-spread sex discrimination, the same jury returned a $250 million punitive damages verdict to the class of victims in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] finding Novartis liable for wide-spread sex discrimination, the same jury returned a $250 million punitive damages verdict to the class of victims in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wal-Mart Faces Historic Class Action Suit Alleging Systemic Sex Discrimination by Women Win Pharmaceutical Industry Sex Bias Class Action &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/04/27/wal-mart-faces-historic-class-action-suit-alleging-systemic-sex-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Women Win Pharmaceutical Industry Sex Bias Class Action &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=350#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] case represents the second largest employment class action on behalf of women, after the Walmart case recently certified to go forward.  The jury found that Novartis had engaged in systematic gender-based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case represents the second largest employment class action on behalf of women, after the Walmart case recently certified to go forward.  The jury found that Novartis had engaged in systematic gender-based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Case Favors Fired Health Care Whistleblower by How can society allow private insurance get away with what they do ? &#124; free-personal-injury-lawyer</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/05/16/new-case-favors-fired-health-care-whistleblower/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>How can society allow private insurance get away with what they do ? &#124; free-personal-injury-lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=372#comment-392</guid>
		<description>[...] New Case Favors Fired Health Care Whistleblower &#124; Maryland &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Case Favors Fired Health Care Whistleblower | Maryland &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Feds Deliver Unemployment Funds to Maryland by Bill White urges Rick Perry to return $161 million in unemployment money from Texas Enterprise Fund &#124; Insurance&#124;Auto Insurance&#124;Health Insurance&#124;Insurance Quotes</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/05/07/feds-deliver-unemployment-funds-to-maryland/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill White urges Rick Perry to return $161 million in unemployment money from Texas Enterprise Fund &#124; Insurance&#124;Auto Insurance&#124;Health Insurance&#124;Insurance Quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 02:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=362#comment-382</guid>
		<description>[...] Feds Deliver Unemployment Funds to Maryland &#124; Maryland Employment &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feds Deliver Unemployment Funds to Maryland | Maryland Employment &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on COBRA Subsidies Live On by Another COBRA Extension Eases Health Insurance Burden &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/03/24/cobra-subsidies-live-on/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Another COBRA Extension Eases Health Insurance Burden &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=315#comment-346</guid>
		<description>[...] week, Congress again extended the reach of the COBRA subsidy.  As reported here before, the subsidy was part of the legislation designed to jump start the economy and ease the pain of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, Congress again extended the reach of the COBRA subsidy.  As reported here before, the subsidy was part of the legislation designed to jump start the economy and ease the pain of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Supreme Court Strongly Endorses Deference to ERISA Administrators by Tweets that mention The Supreme Court Strongly Endorses Deference to ERISA Administrators &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/2010/04/22/the-supreme-court-strongly-endorses-deference-to-erisa-administrators/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Supreme Court Strongly Endorses Deference to ERISA Administrators &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marylandemploymentdevelopments.com/?p=345#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by UKEmploymentLaw. UKEmploymentLaw said: The Supreme Court Strongly Endorses Deference to ERISA ... http://bit.ly/c5jTCw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by UKEmploymentLaw. UKEmploymentLaw said: The Supreme Court Strongly Endorses Deference to ERISA &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/c5jTCw" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c5jTCw</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
